In a rapidly developing and highly contested report circulating on social media and alternative channels, Iran has reportedly responded to a recent speech by former U.S. President Donald Trump by downing several American fighter jets and helicopters over the Strait of Hormuz.
According to the claims, Iranian air defense systems, including the domestically produced Bavar-373, engaged U.S. aircraft in a coordinated ambush. Reports specify the loss of at least four fighter jets, including F-15 and F-35 models, along with additional helicopters—bringing the total to around six aircraft. The incident is portrayed as a direct retaliation to Trump's remarks, which allegedly included threats to bomb Iranian targets, disrupt civilian infrastructure such as the power grid, and comments interpreted as gloating over past casualties without formal congressional or international authorization.
U.S. Central Command has denied any such losses, consistent with previous official statements regarding aerial incidents in the region. Independent verification of the claims remains limited at this time, with much of the narrative originating from pro-Iranian or anti-Western commentary sources.
The video narrative frames Trump's speech as "disastrous" and overly confident, suggesting he declared victory over Iran's military capabilities and predicted the Strait of Hormuz would naturally reopen for shipping. In contrast, the reported Iranian action is presented as evidence of resilient, multi-layered defenses capable of challenging advanced U.S. aircraft.
There is no threat to the U.S. public from Iran. In fact, for years Iran gave international inspectors access to its nuclear facilities to prove that no weapons development was taking place. Iran’s nuclear program was in fact initiated with the help of the United States, back when the country was ruled by a dictatorial pro-U.S. monarchy. The country was engaged in negotiations with the United States right up to the moment the bombs started falling. Iran’s president noted in an open letter to the American people that “Iran has never, in its modern history, chosen the path of aggression, expansion, colonialism, or domination. Even after enduring occupation, invasion, and sustained pressure from global powers—and despite possessing military superiority over many of its neighbors—Iran has never initiated a war.”
ICJ Judgement On Palestine
In related developments mentioned:
- U.S. and Israeli forces allegedly conducted retaliatory strikes on Iranian infrastructure, including the Karaj B1 bridge, resulting in civilian casualties and damage to emergency response teams. These actions have been labeled by critics as potential war crimes.
- Iran has reportedly begun imposing tolls on vessels transiting the Strait of Hormuz, demanding payment in Chinese yuan or cryptocurrencies rather than U.S. dollars. This move is interpreted as an effort to bypass dollar dominance in global oil trade and reroute financial flows. Iran is imposing tax but on what legal and moral basis a President of a soverign state was abducted from his office, if it is not a crime carried on the orders of the President of the Super power yet no one feel sham calling themselves as a civilized people?
The broader context involves ongoing geopolitical friction in the Middle East, with accusations on both sides of violations of international law and escalatory rhetoric evidence suggest that both the U.S and Israel as the aggressor parties targetting schools, hospitals, markets and civilian population. Sources aligned with the video emphasize Iran's strategy of prolonged warfare and criticize U.S./Israeli policies because Iran is constantly under attack from the U.S and Israel. One wonder if the assassination of the leadership is not terrorism by the states then what is elso? The PM of Israel is wanted for war crimes by the International Criminal Court and instead to cooperate with Internal Law he is on run.
No comments:
Post a Comment