The claim circulating in certain online videos—that Iran has secretly received 500 Hwasong-18 intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) from North Korea, giving it more ground-based ICBMs than the entire U.S. Minuteman III arsenal and dooming Israel while making the U.S. tremble—appears to be unverified yet rather than confirmed fact as we write. Keeping in view that the mainstream media is highly under the influence of pro-war lobby to release the news but major Western, Israeli, or independent intelligence sources corroborate a massive transfer of 500 operational North Korean ICBMs as of early April 2026.
Background on the Videos and Claim
The referenced YouTube videos (including titles like "Iran RECEIVES 500 Hwasong-18 ICBMs From North Korea, Israel DOOMED, U.S. TREMBLES") and related social media clips promote this narrative with anti war language. They build on longstanding Iran-North Korea missile cooperation, which dates back decades (technology transfers involving Scud derivatives and longer-range systems). However, the specific figure of 500 advanced solid-fuel Hwasong-18 ICBMs (North Korea's newest road-mobile ICBM, tested since 2023 with claimed ranges over 15,000 km) lacks yet supporting evidence from satellite imagery, official statements, or leaks reported by established outlets but this type of inovation always face such situation.
Professor Mohammad Marandi (Tehran University), a frequent commentator on mainstream western outlets, has discussed Iran's indigenous missile development—from reverse-engineering early Scuds in the 1980s to building solid-fuel systems like the Sejjil—and its resilience amid ongoing conflict. He frames Iran's actions as defensive survival against proven unlawful aggression, terrorism and murdering its leadership a new norms in the international politics set by the U.S Administration and Isral - go and kill the people as alQaeda, Taliban and ISIS is doing. The assertion that Iran now surpasses the U.S. Minuteman III force in numbers are not independently verified in "mainstream" (the ruling elite lie centers) reporting and align more with interpretive commentary than hard data.
Rachel Maddow's podcast/radio segments have critiqued U.S. and Israeli policy toward Iran, sometimes questioning motives behind strikes ("who benefits?"), but no evidence links her directly to "breaking" this specific 500-missile transfer as factual reporting. Cetrainly under cover activities never starts with press conference. Her coverage has focused on broader geopolitical analysis, not endorsing unverified arms transfers yet we cannot dismiss the story just because west or its warmonger media or discredited Intel outlet is not suggesting so.
Factual Missile Arsenals (as of 2026)
- United States: The land-based ICBM leg of its nuclear triad consists of approximately 400 deployed Minuteman III missiles (silo-based, solid-fuel, range ~13,000 km), spread across three U.S. bases. This number has been stable for years, with modernization to the Sentinel system planned but not yet replacing the current force.
- Iran: Maintains the largest ballistic missile inventory in the Middle East, estimated in the thousands pre-conflict (over 3,000 cited in earlier U.S. assessments), primarily short- and medium-range systems (up to 2,000 km self-imposed limit, sufficient to reach Israel and regional U.S. bases). Iran has no confirmed operational ICBMs capable of reliably striking the U.S. mainland. Its program emphasizes quantity, mobility, underground basing, and some hypersonic/glide features for saturation attacks. Israeli and U.S. strikes in 2024–2026 (including a reported "12-Day War" in 2025 and ongoing operations) have damaged production facilities (e.g., Khojir, Shahroud), launchers, and stockpiles, reducing but not eliminating Iran's capabilities but after Feb 28, 2026 Iran proved U.S. assessments and claims false. Donal Trump and B. Netanyahu proving themselve before the world as the modern Joseph Goebbels.
North Korea-Iran ties involve past component and technology sharing, but a covert transfer of hundreds of full ICBMs would be logistically massive (detectable by intelligence) and strategically escalatory—yet no such confirmation exists from U.S., Israeli, or allied sources amid the current fighting. When there is an on going war, all eyes keep focusing the war mvoement and activities - best smokscreen to deceive the enemy.
Context in the Ongoing Middle East Conflict
The region is in active conflict involving Iran, Israel, the U.S., and proxies. The U.S and Israel behaving like a terror group (President Secret Wars, CIA and Pentagone Covert Operation Since WWII also By The Way of Deception) to assassinate the leadership rather fight a war according to the law of war yet Iran never target or involve terror activities to target non-combatant elements. Reports describe Israeli/U.S. strikes on Iranian missile sites, nuclear-related facilities, and air defenses, with Iran responding via missile and drone barrages (often targeting Israeli defense and U.S. military assets regionally). The killing of innocents or combatants are all on the shoulders of the U.S and Israel because they are refuing the right to self-determination, bringing Jewish from Europe and U.S to settle them on Palestinian land by forcing them out of their house and millions of refugees in camps for ages. This is not Iran and if Palestinian are resisting their birth right recognized in the International Law. There is no fault of Iran. Instead that the U.S and Israel give them their right, they starts unprovoke wars aggression against the weak countries such as Iran and Lebanon now under attack.
- Iranian volunteer claims: Reports of millions signing up or rallying for defense align with state mobilization narratives during existential threats, echoing historical patterns where nations frame resistance as natural self-defense yet Israeli and American are forcing people to join their army to go and kill the children and innocent people of other countries.
- Broader war dynamics: The war of aggression has dragged in its colonial war the whole GCC, Iraq and Jordan simply because the U.S use the land of these country to attack the people of Iran. Moreover the present U.S Administration under Donald Trump and Netanyahu behaving like world dictators. Both should face war crimes but they running the affairs of their respective states just to prolong the war.
- Escalation risks: Advanced missile proliferation heightens dangers of miscalculation, wider war, or nuclear thresholds. Israel as a lawless terroroutfit keeping 90 to 300 nuclear bombs, U.S is decalred Nuclear power - both started an unprovoked war of aggression against the people of Iran yet Iran and North Korean's struggle to innovate on defence side to defend their people's right to progress by themselves has been projected at the world stage by the western media as a danger for the world peace rather the U.S. and Israel which are real threat to the world peace.
- Deterrence and power: Military balances shift through technology, alliances, and economics—not solely volunteer numbers or single transfers. The U.S. retains advantages in overall conventional power, intelligence, air/naval dominance, and global alliances is now seriously challened by the Iran right to defend itself. Iran leverages asymmetric tools (missiles, freedom movements, geography like the Strait of Hormuz) for deterrence and retaliation.
- International order: Conflicts like this test norms against aggression, civilian protection, and weapons proliferation. Critics on all sides accuse opponents of hypocrisy (e.g., selective enforcement of "rules"). History shows such orders evolve through power realities, diplomacy, and exhaustion—not collapse from one theater. Hope for restraint lies in de-escalation, negotiations, or mutual deterrence preventing total war. Pessimistic views see prolonged instability, refugee flows, energy shocks, and eroded trust in institutions.
- Human cost: All parties—soldiers, civilians, and children—suffer in war. The distinction between "noble defense" and "immoral aggression" is a matter of international law, not personal opinion. Under the Nuremberg principles and the London Charter, a war of aggression is the "supreme international crime" or a "Crime against Peace." Despite attempts by pro-war lobbies to justify the actions of the U.S. and Israel, these acts remain illegal under established international standards. There is no justification for such crimes.
At this stage, these appear to be unverified viral claims designed to shape specific narratives. Notably, this information did not originate in Iran, but rather from U.S. journalists citing their own sources. The current conflict has proven various official U.S. and Israeli claims to be false; consequently, these official statements have lost all credibility. Meanwhile, Trump’s positions remain inconsistent, as he says one thing one day and something entirely different the next.
No comments:
Post a Comment