Why Muslim theologians don't double-check before they speak out? Is it not harmful to societies by promoting false information in the name of religion? Is it not to defame religion and its followers by projecting the norms of a slave age?

Dr. Zakair Naik probably runs a tv channel with the name "Peace TV" from India and famous public speaker as a Muslim Theologian. 

I am aware that Pakistani and Indian Muslims especially Urdu speakers and lovers of exclusive political ideologies of Islamic Religious supremacists, watch his video talks on YouTube.

I had come across his talks on YouTube where he is giving his views about contraception and sex education, calling it western education yet also it is in Indian schools in Bombay. He is of the view that sex education or telling adult children to use contraception or condom while doing consensual sex so as to avoid any threat of STD, HIV, or unwanted pregnancy which mean the western societies are telling young people how to do adultery rather forbid adultery. He is of the view and thousands seen to be sitting in front, listening like dame fools and absorbing his racists' views and hatred against public sexual health, but, no one dear to challenge him and demand for a piece of evidence. This type of culture is part of every mosque from religious extremism that keeps flourishing for centuries. 

I had challenged Dr. Zakir Naik's views which are false, even contradicting the Quranic text and the sunna of the Prophet. Here are the Qur'an 33:52; 4:24; 23:6; 33:50; 70:30 which allow Muslims to have sex with wives and their slave girls. There is no question that how you got those slave girls whether you had captured them in a war or maybe due to nonpayment of a debt or even gifted by someone. The Muslim translators and interpreters blacken their faces by adding false information that they captured only in the war. This was the slave culture of Mecca that Islam had inherited its values and norms with a minor modification.   

All the above Qur'anic verses allow Prophet himself Qur'an 33:52 and Muslims Qur'an 4:224; 23:6; 33:50; 70:30 to have extramarital sex with their slaves' girls without seeking freedom of them to marry with them.

Certainly, this was a slave culture of the slave age yet Muslim theologians like Dr. Zakir Naik keep growing their beards and spreading false information to misguide illiterate Muslim masses just to promote their conservative political ideologies of slave age in the name of Sharia, Qur'an, and Prophetic sunna. 

Now let me present the Prophetic sunna of the slave age culture, where people were using contraception to avoid unwanted pregnancy with slaves girls which was known as "azal" which means when men doing sex with slave girls, they need to ejaculate outside the of the vagina of the slave girls so to avoid unwanted pregnancy. 

The fact that all religious literature represents the age and culture of a slave colonial era that spread over for thousands of years. There is no exception, be it Qur'an, Thora, Bible, Geeta or Granth, or any other denomination such as Buddhism. To insist that the slave culture of the past slave age is valid today just because a faith community thinks so is a lie, fraud, deception, cheat, and dis-service to human civilization. 

The age of freedom came just in the 20th century. This is UN Charter which started with the words:

"WE THE PEOPLES OF THE UNITED NATIONS DETERMINED to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war, which twice in our lifetime has brought untold sorrow to mankind, and

to reaffirm faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person, in the equal rights of men and women and of nations large and small, and to establish conditions under which justice and respect for the obligations arising from treaties and other sources of international law can be maintained, and to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom,".

In view of the above, it is high time that hatred, ignorance, and extremists ideologies must not be allowed in today's time to destroy societies, basic human rights, and freedom of the individuals and public at large. The places of worship must be allowed as the trenches of hatemongers and exclusionists, the threat to freedom of all human beings.