Aeysha Toor

Aeysha Toor

I think one must not mix some ones' private activities with public activities. What is in the video is not violation of law but at odd with local perceived moral standard? He used words for some one else that he was a womaniser. His language was degrading the opposite gender but allegations against some one without evidence. This come under violation of law and accountability with penalty. There were other videos carrying interviews of some individuals contain serious violation of some-ones' legal rights. One man in video was shown openly threatening to kill him which is a serious crime. I think Doctor might take them to court and even before taking them to court, it is the duty of police after watching the subject video to arrest the person. The reason for removing video, may be because of violation of law. You can not publish allegations until you do have sufficient evidence that could stand in the court of law. If you think you do have sufficient evidence to stand in the court of law, then you can publish only on your own publication. Other publishing venue would never take risk.