Kashmiris from Bhimber to Kargil have refused for 75 years to accept the Line of Control imposed by India and Pakistan against the will of the people of the land. They keep talk about Kashmir while Kashmiris themselves are kept always off the table. No more cheating by India and Pakistan - UKJNews

Kashmiris want their motherland reunited as it existed before 1947—from Lakhanpur to Hunza and from Aksai Chin to Mangla. That is the only solution that can end the suffering they have endured for the past 75 years.

 

The first provisional government of Azad Jammu and Kashmir government was declared in Pallandri on October 4, 1947, with Ghulam Nabi Gilkar (using the alias "Mr. Anwar") as president and Sardar Ibrahim Khan as prime minister, but Gilkar went to Srinagar to talk to Sheikh Muhammad Abdullah where he was arrested.

October 4, 1947 (First Declaration): Declared in Pallandri, Azad Jammu and Kashmir mean free Kashmir from India and Pakistan.  Ghulam Nabi Gilkar (alias Mr. Anwar) served as president and Sardar Ibrahim Khan served as prime minister. Gilkar travelled to Srinagar to talk to National Conference Leader Sheikh Muhammad Abdullah was arrested by the King's forces. 

 This guy don't have even basic

understanding of the law and

Justice system yet he is head

of the Law Enforcement 

October 24, 1947 (Second Declaration): After As Gilkar was arrested by King forces in Srinagar,  Sardar Muhammad Ibrahim Khan became the  president of the provisional government. 

 

 

 

Muzaffarabad/Rawalakot — September 29, 2026 

 

A live broadcast circulating on Tuesday highlighted growing calls in Azad Jammu and Kashmir for Kashmiris to move freely across their historic homeland, even as supplies remain constrained and the Line of Control stays sealed by both Pakistani and Indian forces. 

Someone should tell that terrorist IG that 

*this* is the evidence. Now, let the international 

media find out for themselves exactly 

which war crimes you have committed in 

Azad Kashmir; you will have to answer 

for this, no matter what.

In the stream, commentator Adil Raja said organizers in AJK have asked residents to stock two months of rations ahead of an expected announcement around October 4 in Rawalakot. He described preparations that include moving toward the Line of Control to press for the opening of roads on humanitarian and rights grounds. “Not only the roads are closed from Pakistan’s side,” he said, adding that those who raise their voice for rights face the same kind of pressure seen in other restive regions.

The demand, as framed by supporters of the movement, is that Kashmiris should be able to travel legally in any part of their motherland. Divided families have long lived on opposite sides of the LoC. Limited cross-LoC bus and trade arrangements existed in earlier years but have been tightly controlled, frequently interrupted, and never amounted to free civilian movement. Both militaries continue to treat the line as a hard barrier. 

 

This is people's basic right to resist the

killing forces from outside of the State. 

Raja and other critics allege that Pakistan has restricted essential supplies to the population while security forces on both sides prevent ordinary Kashmiris from crossing. Reports from recent protests in areas close to the LoC, including Mandhol, have included similar accusations that ration flows from Pakistan have been halted for months and that people want routes reopened toward Poonch and Mendhar on the Indian-administered side. Organizers have asked crowds whether they support ending the LoC as a dividing line. 

 

The Joint Awami Action Committee and its allied groups have led peaceful strikes and marches to demand enforcement of agreements already signed by representatives from both sides. Authorities in Islamabad and Muzaffarabad have responded like colonial occupiers. They banned the committee under anti-terrorism provisions without presenting any charges or bringing the matter before a court—the basic legal requirement for banning a political organization. They have also deployed additional forces, imposed communications restrictions (including  telephones), and issued travel advisories.

 

These actions are illegal and violate basic human rights. 

 

Much of the world media has shamefully described the events as “clashes" yet no access to the site where events are taking place. Eyewitnesses say the authorities fired on a peaceful procession to terrorize people. Knowing that the population of AJK stands with the committee, they used violence and live fire as a tool of political terror to keep people away from joining the processions. Instead, the brothers, sisters, and mothers of the victims came forward to resist what they call Pakistani barbarism. 

 

 Evidence  

 

 

Iran allows international media into the country. Pakistan does not allow world media access to AJK and GB, yet much of the global media still repeats the official lies. Fact on the ground by local media and put the death toll at 133 Kashmiris so far, with thousands injured, thousands held illegally in jail, and thousands forcibly disappeared. Pakistan still refuses independent media access that would let the world verify the facts. On what basis world media even entertain Pakistan side of the story as long as they don't allow their reporters to visit the area to meet with the people and observe by themselves. 

 

 

India has cited the unrest as evidence of repression in the territory it calls Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. Like Pakistan, however, India also has its own colonial interests. As a result, both India and Pakistan promote those interests rather than the interests of the people of Jammu and Kashmir on both sides. That is why neither country will open the Line of Control — which is an illegal divide — so that people can travel freely in their own land.

The October 4 date now carries dual significance: a planned PTI-linked march toward Islamabad over Imran Khan’s detention, and the expected next phase of the AJK campaign. Whether the AJK movement remains focused on charter of demands already agreed, or escalates toward the LoC itself, will be tested in the coming days. For now, the practical reality for most Kashmiris is unchanged: they cannot freely visit relatives or markets on the other side of a line drawn in 1949 against the will of the people.