Saturday, March 11, 2023

The abduction of four Americans in Mexico has renewed the focus on narco-trafficking as the US heads into a presidential election next year republicans calling for military intervention. #Mexico #USA #Narco_trafficking

The news story we reproduce here from The LA Times shed light that how the International narco trade is becoming an instrumental tool to create tension between the US and Mexico.  

"As investigators continued their search for the gunmen who kidnapped four Americans in the border city of Matamoros last week, Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador lashed out at U.S. Republican lawmakers who have proposed sending troops into Mexico, telling them that the United States should concentrate on curbing its rampant appetite for illegal drugs.

“Why don’t you take care of your young people? Why don’t you take care of the serious problem of social decay? Why don’t [you] temper the constant increase in drug consumption?” López Obrador asked Thursday at his daily news conference.

López Obrador’s unusually sharp comments came two days after Mexican authorities rescued two of the American tourists and discovered the other two were dead. Their March 3 kidnapping in broad daylight just south of the border sparked calls for American intervention in Mexico’s fight against criminal groups.

The surviving victims, Latavia McGee, 33, and Eric James Williams, 38, were quickly transported across the border, according to Mexican authorities. The bodies of Shaeed Woodard, 33, and Zindell Brown, 28, were repatriated to the U.S. on Thursday after autopsies in Mexico, officials said.

U.S. and Mexican authorities say they still don’t know why the tourists, who entered Mexico so that McGee could undergo a medical procedure, were fired upon by several men, thrown in the back of a pickup truck and hauled away.

On Thursday, law enforcement sources in Tamaulipas state circulated a letter that appeared to be from a local drug cartel that blamed the kidnapping on several rogue members of the group.

The Associated Press cited unnamed sources who said the cartel had turned over five of its members to authorities. That has not been confirmed by Mexican authorities or the FBI, which is helping in the investigation.

Whatever the cause of the kidnapping, it has provoked passionate reactions on both sides of the border, inflaming a long-standing debate about who is responsible for Mexico’s rampant violence and the best way to curb it.

Republican lawmakers pointed this week to the kidnapping as further evidence of what they describe as Mexico’s lawlessness — and the U.S. need to intervene. Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) said Wednesday that American soldiers should be authorized to enter Mexico to destroy drug laboratories.

Citing the surge in recent years of American deaths from fentanyl, most of which is smuggled from Mexico, Republican members of Congress had already been pushing a bill that would allow U.S. armed forces to fight crime south of the border. Last month, the attorneys general of 21 states asked the Biden administration to label drug cartels as terrorist groups.

In Mexico, that kind of rhetoric has raised eyebrows.

Mexicans have long complained that their nation has the geographic misfortune of being next to the United States, the world’s biggest consumer of illicit drugs and the site of the world’s largest stockpile of firearms.

Despite extremely strict firearms laws — there is just one gun store in all of Mexico — the country is flooded daily with weapons smuggled illegally from the United States.

A U.S.-backed effort to confront drug cartels with the Mexican military backfired, leading to an explosion of violence across Mexico that started in 2007 and continues to this day. The Mexican drug war also failed to reduce the quantity of narcotics smuggled into the United States.

López Obrador has frequently criticized Mexico’s militarized approach to combating drug trafficking, accusing his predecessors of turning the country into “a graveyard,” even though his own crime-fighting strategy hasn’t varied much from theirs in practice."

No comments: