Term “me-ra-si culture” used by Ansar Abbasi in his urdu piece published on 31st
Jan. 2012 in daily Jang, (Ansar Abbasi's article an example of feudal superiority) criticising the opposition and anger both by public and media against a resolution passed by Punjab Assembly banning
music concerts on the premises of education institutions. This was in spite of
the fact that the music concerts had been organized by students themselves for
a healthy socialization, interaction and better understanding among student
community.
The music concerts are the only alternative socialization creating
better understanding by cutting across colour, tribe, religion, sect or gender
division. The ground reality is that Pakistani
society has been and is deeply polarized and is very intolerant towards each
others.
Target killing and attack on places of worship on sectarian basis
become norms of daily life. Terrorists are
roaming around freely. There is no administrative or ideological counter point
to the terrorist and sectarian driver for power.
Keeping the above situation in view, the state must have to
encouraged and invest in alternative venues for socialization where people
could have chance to mingle themselves as human beings regardless of colour,
gender or sect. This would certainly help to create harmonious trends both
among individuals and as whole. The musical
concert by students themselves is a ray of positive hope.
The irony that the women MPA who had proposed resolution, belonging
to a party that was cloned by Mushraf and his government. The Alhamra incident where young students Sara
Nawaz, Maheen Naseem and Nimra, lost
their lives. (possibility of a terrorists conspiracy to scare people off) God bless these little souls who become victim of ill management,
greed and conspiracy by terrorist so that to scare people off from
socialization.
Instead of proposing a resolution to check on short comings and to
improve safety standard, they opted to ban concert so that the terrorists could have more chances of recruitment.
Ansar Abbasi clearly had supported a culture that is alien to a cosmopolitan
life. He is still living purely with a racial mind-set yet enjoying the
facilities of modern innovation. There
are some questions, one need to ask him because he is an investigating
journalist. Is it possible for a person
of his mindset which is clearly visible from his piece, could do justice with
his professional duties?
Q-1: What does he mean by "meerasi culture."? To the best of my knowledge, there is
nothing called "me-ra-si” culture.
Q-2: Term "mee-ra-si" is not a cultural term but a
profession specific to trabo-agrarian culture of 18th 19th
and early 20th centuries. The term "mee-ra-si" been used
for entertainers especially for feudal class and considered to be low class. Is he considered them even today as lower
class of human being?
Q-3: The structure of tribo-agrarian/feudal society was mainly
feudals (jagerdar) with big lands, peasantry with small and medium land
holdings. Their productive activities mostly confounded to agriculture and live
stocks. Abbasi knows very well that the structure
of society is very well socially grounded based on social unit. Not based on
race, tribe, religion, sect or colour. Yet different tribes do not enter into
marriage relationship just because inferior and superior concept in spite that
both tribes may be of same religion and sect.
How he would fit a “me-ra-si” in this situation?
Q-4: The other very
important aspect of that society is, other classes an essential part of tribo/agrarian
and feudal culture. The landless people known
with different titles and professions are: Harris (tenants); Lohar (blacksmith); Mouchi (Shoe maker); Naaie (barber);
Kuumar (crockery producers); Kasbee (cloths manufactures); Dooms &
Meerasi (entertainers/musicians). The place I born and brought-up was having
bajai wala (bagpipe, a connection with Scotland ) and drum. These people
known as “kami kameen” mean low race. They are part of social unit of society
but land owners, poor small or big don’t enter into relationship with them in
spite of same religion or sect. But when
these “kami kameen” and land owners, small or big went to industrial cities, to
work in steel mills, shoe factories; become co-worker, co-employee and start entering
into relationship. Are you suggesting
that Pakistani are still living in 19th century where “me-ra-si” and
other low classes considered to be low of lowest human being? If you still hate
people just because of their profession, what kind of Islam you are upholding?
Q-5: Are you upholding a specific image perception of a person? Are
you suggesting that people with beard
are from superior class? If you perceived
a beard man is the criteria, then what about Abu Jhail and Abu Lab? They were having
beard too.
I hope people would unite to resist against hate mongers and
discriminators. Mr. Abbasi must have to offer his unconditional apology by
calling artists as “me-ra-si” and cultural activities of indigenous people “me-ra-si culture. There
are not one, two or three, but dozens of
prophetic traditions for socialization, music and singing. People are mature enough to decide by themselves
about their faith (pick and choose Islam don't work). They don’t want people like Abbasi or some one else to tell
them what to believe and what not to believe? What to wear and what not to wear? What to eat
and what not to eat or whom to meet and whom not to meet?
No comments:
Post a Comment